I found the following about “Brandjacking” in today’s MarketingVOX rather timely:
The “Brandjacking Index,” a four-week survey by MarkMonitor, found that cybersquatting, in which illegal sites pirate popular trademarks via phishing, clickfraud and similar tactics, runs rampant online.
Brands abusers serve as dangers not merely for consumers, but also for the brands themselves. They are often better web marketers (emphasis added by me…see addendum below), with media and Internet companies the most attractive targets, accounting for 31 percent of the abuse.
I bet the powers that be never thought they’d be “Brandjacked.” And come to think of it I wonder why the Cleveland+ and Cleveland+ Business websites each don’t have a blog, podcast and/or social network incorporated into them?
Report: ‘Brandjacking’ Intensifies - MarketingVOX
Addendum: I decided to enter a handful of keywords in Google to see if the Cleveland+ Marketing Alliance was doing any keyword advertising. Unfortunately it doesn’t appear as if they are as nothing came up linking back to their websites. But when I Googled “GCP” the following came up as the third paid search listing:
Wasting $8.5 MM
fCleveland+
A response to Cleveland+
www.fclevelandplus.com