Recent Comments
- John Polk said “I knew Charles when he was EVP of The Atlanta Chamber and I worked for ...” on Memories of Oklahoma City circa 1993
- John Polk said “Back in the mid-80's and early 90's, Cleveland was actually recognized as one of the ...” on Economic development in NEO: A view from the street-level
- John Polk said “Is there any way to substantiate Dimora's claim re: GCP and the PD, other than ...” on Cleveland’s new development dynamic?
- George Nemeth said “Like all glimmers of newness in CLE+ I expect this one to be crushed too” on Cleveland’s new development dynamic?
- Cleveland’s new development dynamic? | Brewed Fresh Daily said “[...] by Ohio voters, as gambling interests convert the Ohio constitution into a zoning ordinance. ...” on Ohio’s casino deal gets a bit more messy
- About BDP Comments
Meta
Ed Morrison · Colorado’s new strategy document
July 22nd, 2011
Colorado’s governor has released his Blueprint for the state’s economic development strategy. Not surprisingly, given the times, the plan encourages the state to reduce government red tape and increase “access to capital”.
The governor calls the document — a “bottom up” approach to strategy. That’s revealing of a mindset. In a traditional approach to economic development, leaders think in these hierarchical terms. But today, we live in an age of open networks, and we must learn to think differently about how economic development takes place.
A network has no top or bottom.
At the same time, strategy in loosely joined networks is more demanding than traditional approaches to strategy. To move an open network, a strategy needs clear, concise outcomes that are measurable. Without a command and control structure to move people, a strategy in open networks must emotionally engage people. Outcomes must create shared value in order to be sustainable. Outcomes and coherence are more important than vision and vague goals (which too often are simply statements of activities).
Finally, effective strategy in open networks requires shared responsibility for implementation. Transparent action plans enable members of a network to hold each other accountable and to know which way to jump when circumstances change (as they inevitably will).
Along these dimensions, the Colorado Blueprint makes some progress, but it falls short.
Last 5 posts by Ed Morrison
- Signing off - February 3rd, 2012
- "The current global development model is unsustainable" - February 1st, 2012
- Market opportunities for developing Chicago's green economy - January 29th, 2012
- Plain Dealer flubs its explanation for firing Tony Grossi - January 27th, 2012
- Linking and leveraging university assets to strengthen regional economies - January 27th, 2012

