Recent Comments
- John Polk said “I knew Charles when he was EVP of The Atlanta Chamber and I worked for ...” on Memories of Oklahoma City circa 1993
- John Polk said “Back in the mid-80's and early 90's, Cleveland was actually recognized as one of the ...” on Economic development in NEO: A view from the street-level
- John Polk said “Is there any way to substantiate Dimora's claim re: GCP and the PD, other than ...” on Cleveland’s new development dynamic?
- George Nemeth said “Like all glimmers of newness in CLE+ I expect this one to be crushed too” on Cleveland’s new development dynamic?
- Cleveland’s new development dynamic? | Brewed Fresh Daily said “[...] by Ohio voters, as gambling interests convert the Ohio constitution into a zoning ordinance. ...” on Ohio’s casino deal gets a bit more messy
- About BDP Comments
Meta
Ed Morrison · More on corruption in China
July 31st, 2009
This week in Xi’an, I am receiving a graduate education in Chinese corruption networks. I understand more fully how they form, how they operate, and why they are so difficult to eliminate.
In the United States, we have federal prosecutors who represent “the people” with the right to examine the behavior of our local elected officials. If they have a reasonable basis to believe that illegal activity has taken place, they can appeal to the federal court to obtain the authority to wiretap and seize documents. That’s exactly what’s taking place now in Cuyahoga County.
In the United States, independent federal prosecutors give both form and substance to the rights of the people to oversee the activities of public officials. That is why it is particularly dangerous for political officials to politicize the office of Federal prosecutors, as the Bush administration apparently attempted to do. (New revelations out only yesterday indicate that Karl Rove played a more detailed role in the dismissal of federal prosecutors that he has admitted.)
The independent power of the federal prosecutor, supervised by the federal court, to investigate public officials provides a critical check on the power of public officials.
If you read the Chinese constitution, the people are also given the right to oversee their local political leaders. Yet, the constitutional right of the people to oversee their political leaders is never realized. The Communist Party is in the position of overseeing itself. There is no independent government prosecutor. There is no court system independent of the influence of the Communist Party.
There is no independent power for a representative of the people to seize records or wiretap telephone calls. There is no way for the people to shine a light on the networks of corruption that inevitably emerge when flawed human beings, avaricious and ambitious, assume the power of public office.
It makes you marvel at how a small group of political leaders in 1787 came up with such a brilliant solution.
Last 5 posts by Ed Morrison
- Signing off - February 3rd, 2012
- "The current global development model is unsustainable" - February 1st, 2012
- Market opportunities for developing Chicago's green economy - January 29th, 2012
- Plain Dealer flubs its explanation for firing Tony Grossi - January 27th, 2012
- Linking and leveraging university assets to strengthen regional economies - January 27th, 2012
