Recent Comments
- Ed Morrison said “Carla: You are welcome. I hope we can all benefit from this powerful line of ...” on Food and cancer prevention
- Brian Cummins said “The following was posted as a comment on the Plain Dealer blog -- http://blog.clev~ ----------------~ ...” on Cuyahoga Board of Elections to enter agreement with US Dept of Justice to accommodate Puerto Rican Voters
- Carla said “Ed, thank you so much for posting this very important video. I will be passing ...” on Food and cancer prevention
- JS said “Since Seth Priebatsch and his ilk look to be rediscovering captology and serious gaming, the ...” on More on the video gaming software cluster
- John Polk said “We took a couple small stabs at a gaming strategy a few years ago with ...” on More on the video gaming software cluster
- About BDP Comments
Meta
Ed Morrison · Med Mart: Feeble leverage
January 10th, 2009
Cross posted at Map the Mess. Got ideas on how to sort out the Med Mart Mess? Submit them here.
In an AP story last week, County Commissioner Peter Lawson Jones, the designated driver on the Med Mart deal, steps forward to explain the situation. (What happened to Commissioner Hagan?)
Cleveland development project delayed
On it’s face, the deal looks like a really lopsided public private partnership.
The Public investment:
“The revenue stream already exists to support an estimated $490 million for construction and close to $1 billion for the debt payoff…”
The private investment:
Merchandise Mart Properties will get the Medical Mart revenue, but will also be responsible for capital improvements. It committed $20 million toward the project.
Downtown development projects work when public money leverages private investment. In solid projects, typically these ratios in the neighborhood 4:1 or 5:1. In other words, 1 of public investment leverages $4 or $5 of private investment. They can range upward of $10 or higher.
In the Med Mart project, a public investment of $490 million apparently will leverage $20 million: A leverage ratio of 0.04:1. For every dollar of public investment, the private sector is putting up 4 cents. (And we’re not really sure whether the public investment will have to be extended to cover additional road infrastructure.)
For comparison, take a look at how the City of Vancouver, WA estimated returns from its convention center investments: Downtown Development Return on Investment Study. They conclude:
The estimated public investment leverage ratio associated with the City’s investments is 9.3:1.
Is it any wonder that the Med Mart has left a lot of unanswered questions?
In a letter to the editors of the PD this week, a reader notes:
I have a degree in business and still can’t figure out this medical mart deal. The citizens of Cuyahoga County must shell out almost the entire three-quarters of a billion dollars to build the complex, which we then must hand over to a private company (which is not financially sound, according to the latest reports) to run at a profit — not to us, but to them. For what? Vague promises of a jump-start to Cleveland’s economy.
Medical mart negotiations are a joke
Without more public information, we are all stumbling around a dark house with a failing flashlight.
Last 5 posts by Ed Morrison
- Food and cancer prevention - August 31st, 2010
- BFD Learning Moment: Detroit moves on design as a strategy - August 30th, 2010
- More on the video gaming software cluster - August 30th, 2010
- Building NEO's clean energy economy - August 29th, 2010
- Mentor Technology Greenhouse - August 29th, 2010
