Recent Comments
- John Polk said “I knew Charles when he was EVP of The Atlanta Chamber and I worked for ...” on Memories of Oklahoma City circa 1993
- John Polk said “Back in the mid-80's and early 90's, Cleveland was actually recognized as one of the ...” on Economic development in NEO: A view from the street-level
- John Polk said “Is there any way to substantiate Dimora's claim re: GCP and the PD, other than ...” on Cleveland’s new development dynamic?
- George Nemeth said “Like all glimmers of newness in CLE+ I expect this one to be crushed too” on Cleveland’s new development dynamic?
- Cleveland’s new development dynamic? | Brewed Fresh Daily said “[...] by Ohio voters, as gambling interests convert the Ohio constitution into a zoning ordinance. ...” on Ohio’s casino deal gets a bit more messy
- About BDP Comments
Meta
Ed Morrison · Cleveland’s expertise in early child education
December 21st, 2009
In Cleveland’s next economy, prosperity will depend more on brain development than real estate development.
Over the past decade, leading-edge economists and policy analysts have drawn the connection between early childhood education and economic development. See for example:
The prestigious Committee for Economic Development report, Preschool for All; Nobel laureate James Heckman’s work on the economic value of early child care The prominent role that the Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank is playing in shaping early child care policy as an economic development strategy
Cleveland and Cuyahoga County have nationally recognized experts in early childhood education. Yet, these capabilities are still strangely detached from a meaningful economic development strategy. My sense is that Cleveland’s leaders view early childhood initiatives as human service investments that stand apart from economic development.
Big mistake. Early child investments boost productivity and are tightly bound to economic development strategy.
All of these thoughts came to mind, as I read this New York Times article out of Buffalo:
For much of the last century, educators and many scientists believed that children could not learn math at all before the age of five, that their brains simply were not ready.
But recent research has turned that assumption on its head — that, and a host of other conventional wisdom about geometry, reading, language and self-control in class. The findings, mostly from a branch of research called cognitive neuroscience, are helping to clarify when young brains are best able to grasp fundamental concepts.
Studying Young Minds, and How to Teach Them
Last 5 posts by Ed Morrison
- Signing off - February 3rd, 2012
- "The current global development model is unsustainable" - February 1st, 2012
- Market opportunities for developing Chicago's green economy - January 29th, 2012
- Plain Dealer flubs its explanation for firing Tony Grossi - January 27th, 2012
- Linking and leveraging university assets to strengthen regional economies - January 27th, 2012
