Recent Comments
- John Polk said “I knew Charles when he was EVP of The Atlanta Chamber and I worked for ...” on Memories of Oklahoma City circa 1993
- John Polk said “Back in the mid-80's and early 90's, Cleveland was actually recognized as one of the ...” on Economic development in NEO: A view from the street-level
- John Polk said “Is there any way to substantiate Dimora's claim re: GCP and the PD, other than ...” on Cleveland’s new development dynamic?
- George Nemeth said “Like all glimmers of newness in CLE+ I expect this one to be crushed too” on Cleveland’s new development dynamic?
- Cleveland’s new development dynamic? | Brewed Fresh Daily said “[...] by Ohio voters, as gambling interests convert the Ohio constitution into a zoning ordinance. ...” on Ohio’s casino deal gets a bit more messy
- About BDP Comments
Meta
Ed Morrison · Tower City: Watergate redux
August 9th, 2008
This is all getting a little weird.
First we have the case of the missing photograph.
Now we have Hagan sounding like Nixon, assuring us that everything is OK, because, well, the commissioners are not crooks.
Hagan criticized skeptics who associate the project with the ongoing investigation. Nobody has been proven guilty, he said.
Medical mart’s cost jumps $136 million, tax revenue estimate rises $90 million
After fifteen years of studying this project, they still don’t know what the convention center should cost.
The only good that will come from this mess: The Plain Dealer could win a Pulitzer.
Last 5 posts by Ed Morrison
- Signing off - February 3rd, 2012
- "The current global development model is unsustainable" - February 1st, 2012
- Market opportunities for developing Chicago's green economy - January 29th, 2012
- Plain Dealer flubs its explanation for firing Tony Grossi - January 27th, 2012
- Linking and leveraging university assets to strengthen regional economies - January 27th, 2012

August 9th, 2008 at 12:16 pm
Ed, I encourage you to make some qualitative distinctions here. Local TV I teams have become, for the most part, the functional “news” equivalent of food-fight shows such as Jerry Springer’s. I don’t know how much stock I’d put in their stories. In their classic manner, here they’re grasping at a fairly microscopic gotcha piece of a sprawling story that they should be trying to come to terms with, but won’t. I would hope you don’t encourage them in their structural irresponsibility by calling too much attention to this kind of stuff.
August 9th, 2008 at 2:37 pm
John:
You are taking me too seriously.
August 9th, 2008 at 3:37 pm
You always struck me as a fairly serious guy. I guess I just haven’t ever seen enough of your lighter side. But then, it is August…
August 10th, 2008 at 11:47 am
John, I think it has to do more with the material.
August 13th, 2008 at 8:21 pm
I didn’t know they now gave Pulitzers for p.r. and cheerleading.