<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: links for 2008-10-29</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brewedfreshdaily.com/2008/links-for-2008-10-29/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brewedfreshdaily.com/2008/links-for-2008-10-29</link>
	<description>Locally owned and operated from Cleveland, OH since 2002</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Dec 2011 22:07:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: George Nemeth</title>
		<link>http://www.brewedfreshdaily.com/2008/links-for-2008-10-29/comment-page-1#comment-2462</link>
		<dc:creator>George Nemeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brewedfreshdaily.com/2008/links-for-2008-10-29#comment-2462</guid>
		<description>@Stuart Spivack: Ah. Thanks for clearing that up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stuart Spivack: Ah. Thanks for clearing that up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Spivack</title>
		<link>http://www.brewedfreshdaily.com/2008/links-for-2008-10-29/comment-page-1#comment-2461</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Spivack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brewedfreshdaily.com/2008/links-for-2008-10-29#comment-2461</guid>
		<description>Yikes. I really wasn&#039;t very clear at all in my comment. First of all, I&#039;m referring to your first link above about &quot;smart internal linking.&quot; And when I say &quot;your readers can tell,&quot; I&#039;m referring to a hypothetical blogger following the advice in the article. Then when I say &quot;as you read the article,&quot; I&#039;m referring to us reading this post and the comments.

Sorry for the confusion. It would have been a lot easier for me to make those things clear in my original comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yikes. I really wasn&#8217;t very clear at all in my comment. First of all, I&#8217;m referring to your first link above about &#8220;smart internal linking.&#8221; And when I say &#8220;your readers can tell,&#8221; I&#8217;m referring to a hypothetical blogger following the advice in the article. Then when I say &#8220;as you read the article,&#8221; I&#8217;m referring to us reading this post and the comments.</p>
<p>Sorry for the confusion. It would have been a lot easier for me to make those things clear in my original comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Nemeth</title>
		<link>http://www.brewedfreshdaily.com/2008/links-for-2008-10-29/comment-page-1#comment-2460</link>
		<dc:creator>George Nemeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brewedfreshdaily.com/2008/links-for-2008-10-29#comment-2460</guid>
		<description>@Stuart Spivack: Say what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stuart Spivack: Say what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart Spivack</title>
		<link>http://www.brewedfreshdaily.com/2008/links-for-2008-10-29/comment-page-1#comment-2458</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Spivack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brewedfreshdaily.com/2008/links-for-2008-10-29#comment-2458</guid>
		<description>Some of your readers can tell when you&#039;re adding a link to provide important context and when you&#039;re adding a link to boost your google rank. As you read the article it becomes more and more clear that he&#039;s talking abut the second. A &quot;possibly related posts&quot; feature like in Wordpress would be a less insulting alternative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some of your readers can tell when you&#8217;re adding a link to provide important context and when you&#8217;re adding a link to boost your google rank. As you read the article it becomes more and more clear that he&#8217;s talking abut the second. A &#8220;possibly related posts&#8221; feature like in Wordpress would be a less insulting alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

