Recent Comments
- JS said “Would April be when Strategic Focuses are chosen? Proposed? Both? Do action plans have result ...” on Managing a regional strategy
- JS said “When a reporter writes "Those entities are collaborating to move high-tech research and development to ...” on Looking at the Third Frontier
- Ed Morrison said “JS. You've lost me.” on Looking at the Third Frontier
- JS said “"a firm" Yes, anyone can do a search and find one firm. It would be ...” on Looking at the Third Frontier
- Ed Morrison said “Well, JS, it took me about five minutes to find a firm that is using ...” on Looking at the Third Frontier
- About BDP Comments
Meta
George Nemeth · links for 2008-10-29
October 29th, 2008
-
"I wonder if anyone would be willing to work for their share?"
-
"There's always a bigger fish." – Qui-Gon Callahan lists banks acquired by Nat City since '90
Last 5 posts by George Nemeth
- A tale of town city workers - February 8th, 2010
- O Opens - February 5th, 2010
- I high rec seeing CityMusic CLE - February 4th, 2010
- The Ruse of the Econ Dev consultant - January 20th, 2010
- Dear Cleveland, It's really hard to love you sometimes - November 5th, 2009
October 29th, 2008 at 7:52 pm
Some of your readers can tell when you’re adding a link to provide important context and when you’re adding a link to boost your google rank. As you read the article it becomes more and more clear that he’s talking abut the second. A “possibly related posts” feature like in Wordpress would be a less insulting alternative.
October 29th, 2008 at 8:01 pm
@Stuart Spivack: Say what?
October 29th, 2008 at 8:10 pm
Yikes. I really wasn’t very clear at all in my comment. First of all, I’m referring to your first link above about “smart internal linking.” And when I say “your readers can tell,” I’m referring to a hypothetical blogger following the advice in the article. Then when I say “as you read the article,” I’m referring to us reading this post and the comments.
Sorry for the confusion. It would have been a lot easier for me to make those things clear in my original comment.
October 29th, 2008 at 8:33 pm
@Stuart Spivack: Ah. Thanks for clearing that up!