Recent Comments
- John Polk said “I knew Charles when he was EVP of The Atlanta Chamber and I worked for ...” on Memories of Oklahoma City circa 1993
- John Polk said “Back in the mid-80's and early 90's, Cleveland was actually recognized as one of the ...” on Economic development in NEO: A view from the street-level
- John Polk said “Is there any way to substantiate Dimora's claim re: GCP and the PD, other than ...” on Cleveland’s new development dynamic?
- George Nemeth said “Like all glimmers of newness in CLE+ I expect this one to be crushed too” on Cleveland’s new development dynamic?
- Cleveland’s new development dynamic? | Brewed Fresh Daily said “[...] by Ohio voters, as gambling interests convert the Ohio constitution into a zoning ordinance. ...” on Ohio’s casino deal gets a bit more messy
- About BDP Comments
Meta
George Nemeth · links for 2008-10-29
October 29th, 2008
-
"I wonder if anyone would be willing to work for their share?"
-
"There's always a bigger fish." – Qui-Gon Callahan lists banks acquired by Nat City since '90
Last 5 posts by George Nemeth
- My letter to the Brad and Joe show - June 10th, 2011
- Creating Conversation - June 7th, 2011
- Justin Bibb on CLE and DET - August 23rd, 2010
- Cleveland International Film Fest Year 34 - March 18th, 2010
- A tale of town city workers - February 8th, 2010
October 29th, 2008 at 7:52 pm
Some of your readers can tell when you’re adding a link to provide important context and when you’re adding a link to boost your google rank. As you read the article it becomes more and more clear that he’s talking abut the second. A “possibly related posts” feature like in Wordpress would be a less insulting alternative.
October 29th, 2008 at 8:01 pm
@Stuart Spivack: Say what?
October 29th, 2008 at 8:10 pm
Yikes. I really wasn’t very clear at all in my comment. First of all, I’m referring to your first link above about “smart internal linking.” And when I say “your readers can tell,” I’m referring to a hypothetical blogger following the advice in the article. Then when I say “as you read the article,” I’m referring to us reading this post and the comments.
Sorry for the confusion. It would have been a lot easier for me to make those things clear in my original comment.
October 29th, 2008 at 8:33 pm
@Stuart Spivack: Ah. Thanks for clearing that up!