Recent Comments
- Brian Cummins said “The following was posted as a comment on the Plain Dealer blog -- http://blog.clev~ ----------------~ ...” on Cuyahoga Board of Elections to enter agreement with US Dept of Justice to accommodate Puerto Rican Voters
- Carla said “Ed, thank you so much for posting this very important video. I will be passing ...” on Food and cancer prevention
- JS said “Since Seth Priebatsch and his ilk look to be rediscovering captology and serious gaming, the ...” on More on the video gaming software cluster
- John Polk said “We took a couple small stabs at a gaming strategy a few years ago with ...” on More on the video gaming software cluster
- More on the video gaming software cluster | Brewed Fresh Daily said “[...] my earlier post, I told the story of how NEO missed an opportunity in ...” on The game layer
- About BDP Comments
Meta
George Nemeth · links for 2008-10-29
October 29th, 2008
-
"I wonder if anyone would be willing to work for their share?"
-
"There's always a bigger fish." – Qui-Gon Callahan lists banks acquired by Nat City since '90
Last 5 posts by George Nemeth
- Justin Bibb on CLE and DET - August 23rd, 2010
- Cleveland International Film Fest Year 34 - March 18th, 2010
- A tale of town city workers - February 8th, 2010
- O Opens - February 5th, 2010
- I high rec seeing CityMusic CLE - February 4th, 2010
October 29th, 2008 at 7:52 pm
Some of your readers can tell when you’re adding a link to provide important context and when you’re adding a link to boost your google rank. As you read the article it becomes more and more clear that he’s talking abut the second. A “possibly related posts” feature like in Wordpress would be a less insulting alternative.
October 29th, 2008 at 8:01 pm
@Stuart Spivack: Say what?
October 29th, 2008 at 8:10 pm
Yikes. I really wasn’t very clear at all in my comment. First of all, I’m referring to your first link above about “smart internal linking.” And when I say “your readers can tell,” I’m referring to a hypothetical blogger following the advice in the article. Then when I say “as you read the article,” I’m referring to us reading this post and the comments.
Sorry for the confusion. It would have been a lot easier for me to make those things clear in my original comment.
October 29th, 2008 at 8:33 pm
@Stuart Spivack: Ah. Thanks for clearing that up!