Recent Comments
- John Polk said “I knew Charles when he was EVP of The Atlanta Chamber and I worked for ...” on Memories of Oklahoma City circa 1993
- John Polk said “Back in the mid-80's and early 90's, Cleveland was actually recognized as one of the ...” on Economic development in NEO: A view from the street-level
- John Polk said “Is there any way to substantiate Dimora's claim re: GCP and the PD, other than ...” on Cleveland’s new development dynamic?
- George Nemeth said “Like all glimmers of newness in CLE+ I expect this one to be crushed too” on Cleveland’s new development dynamic?
- Cleveland’s new development dynamic? | Brewed Fresh Daily said “[...] by Ohio voters, as gambling interests convert the Ohio constitution into a zoning ordinance. ...” on Ohio’s casino deal gets a bit more messy
- About BDP Comments
Meta
Ed Morrison · Great Lakes Wind
October 7th, 2008
Image via Wikipedia
Although Michigan borders four Great Lakes and has the most offshore wind potential, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, is likely to beat it to the punch with a proposed wind farm in Lake Erie several miles from Cleveland.
Last week a task force chaired by the Cuyahoga County prosecutor released an installment in an ongoing $1 million feasibility study giving the project a green light on geologic and wind-potential grounds. If the study continues to yield positive findings, construction of two to 10 wind turbines and a research station could start in about two years.
Studies Lift Hopes for Great Lakes Wind Turbine Farms
Michigan Report: Michigan’s Offshore Wind Potential
also
Michigan Great Lakes Offshore Wind: Permitting Dry Run (May 2008)
and
Cuyahoga Wind Energy Task Force
Last 5 posts by Ed Morrison
- Signing off - February 3rd, 2012
- "The current global development model is unsustainable" - February 1st, 2012
- Market opportunities for developing Chicago's green economy - January 29th, 2012
- Plain Dealer flubs its explanation for firing Tony Grossi - January 27th, 2012
- Linking and leveraging university assets to strengthen regional economies - January 27th, 2012

October 7th, 2008 at 2:10 pm
Yes I was very pleased to read this in The Post; just technical question, why is the Prosecutor chairing the committee? Just an interest of his? I would have assumed it would be someone in Econ Dev. Not that it matters, I suppose!
October 7th, 2008 at 3:24 pm
Carole, I think if you want economic things to develop, about the last person you want advice from is… Economic Development. Look how spectacularly wrong they’ve been in the past.
October 7th, 2008 at 6:14 pm
I had the same question Carole did. It strikes me as odd.
October 7th, 2008 at 7:05 pm
My guess is that because the Board of Commissioners commissioned the project, they chose their attorney and chief counsel–Bill Mason to head up the task force.
October 7th, 2008 at 10:14 pm
This is an excellent idea so why will it take two years to get started on it. We need power. The wind is power. The only question should be where to place it and/or how many locations it should be placed. For a change the wind can work for us instead of against us and can do it without destroying nature.
It is really a shame we can’t put little wind units on the top of cars and use them in place of gas. Look funny, well……yes. But I am willing to be laughed at as I drive past gas stations.
October 8th, 2008 at 3:32 pm
We put a client’s Eco Village town house on the market last week…his highest electric bill is 29 dollars. Eco Village has solar panels on all the garages, maintained by the company that made them; wind can do for us what solar panels are doing and I know I am preaching to the choir here. It would be nice if they could do it sooner but 2 years is better than the normal ten!
I still don’t understand about the guy in charge of this project but thanks for the explanation. Maybe it’s a sign that we don’t have much crime so not much prosecution work to do. And if a prosecutor can get it done better and faster then I say okay!